10 Comments
User's avatar
JG's avatar

I'm a bit late to this piece but that was excellent. Excellent analysis and a much needed re-examination of his battle

Even before reading this I do remember looking over the battle and thinking, in comparison to what was to come, this was more a 'minor victory' for Rommel than a 'major defeat' for the Americans.

Really, it did indeed spur the US on to become the formidable opponent the Axis would later contend with.

Expand full comment
Robert A Mosher (he/him)'s avatar

At Kasserine they were still using the M3 TD's which were halftracks armed with a 75mm gun - open topped vehicles with minimal armor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_Gun_Motor_Carriage

Expand full comment
Madjack's avatar

In the classic movie “Patton” it was portrayed as a stunning defeat. Atkinsons trilogy was very enjoyable.

Expand full comment
Secretary of Defense Rock's avatar

Ya he’s the best

Expand full comment
Jesse S's avatar

Very well written. Awesome read.

Expand full comment
Secretary of Defense Rock's avatar

Thanks, be sure to subscribe!

Expand full comment
Pete B's avatar

One man’s defeat is another man’s learning experience. Good article.

Expand full comment
Secretary of Defense Rock's avatar

Thanks! If you enjoyed be sure to subscribe!

Expand full comment
Rob steffes's avatar

Excellent analysis! The US Army was a green outfit in North Africa with a subpar commander in .fredendall, but as you point out, they fought well. Tactically the Americans lost some engagements but they came back to win strategically. The Axis surrender amounted to a bag of POWs equal to Stalingrad. A comparison with the Ardennes offensive is apt.

Expand full comment
Sergio Amecci's avatar

Good piece, and arguably the Kasserine disaster is overblown. However, please double check production numbers. Over 200k artillery pieces produced by US in 1943 alone, while total (including mortars) was around 350k.

Expand full comment